Chat
|
Daily Search
|
My GenForum
|
Community Standards
|
Terms of Service
|
|
|
Kit 88349 (descending from Burwell) doesn't carry the double.
The documented facts don't allow for John the Tory to be only one step different from 3A: descendants of two of his sons carry the two-step mutation, and so do the descendants of William Pace of Robertson County TN (kits 10683, 16218, and 134499).
William of TN couldn't be a son of John the Tory. He was born between 1740-1750 (census data). Burwell's petition makes clear he was the second son and Richmond was the eldest.
So the double mutation (if it was a double mutation) occurred in a common ancestor of John the Tory and Wlliam of TN. Possibly as a double, possibly in two different generations.
There's no evidence Stephen Pace was a son of John the Tory, but then there's also no evidence that he was the father of Alsey Pace (kit 19490) and/or Edmond Pace (21419). The father of those two (if they were brothers) is simply unknown. The given names do suggest they could have been grandsons of John the Tory, through an as-yet-unidentified son. Both "Alsey" and "Edmund" occur in the family of John the Tory, and "Alsey" also occurs in the family of William Pace of TN.
James Blair
Notify Administrator about this message?
Followups:
|
| http://genforum.genealogy.com/pace/messages/4154.html | ||
 |
Link to GenForum Add Forum |
|